<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 91 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59986</link>
    <description>Penalty for late filing of a wealth-tax return was not leviable where the assessee showed a genuine belief, supported by the wealth statement, that net wealth was negative and therefore no taxable wealth existed. On those facts, the delayed return was attributable to reasonable cause, and the request for extension was treated as a precautionary step rather than an admission of liability. The deletion of penalty was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 91 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59986</link>
      <description>Penalty for late filing of a wealth-tax return was not leviable where the assessee showed a genuine belief, supported by the wealth statement, that net wealth was negative and therefore no taxable wealth existed. On those facts, the delayed return was attributable to reasonable cause, and the request for extension was treated as a precautionary step rather than an admission of liability. The deletion of penalty was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>