<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 122 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59979</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the reopening of assessment under section 147(a) of the IT Act for alleged non-disclosure of income from race horses. The Tribunal found the ITO&#039;s grounds for reassessment lacking and determined that the income from horse breeding was exempt under relevant provisions. It directed a reevaluation of the case, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the treatment of income from horse sales and the interpretation of &quot;livestock&quot; under section 10(27). The appeal was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside for reconsideration in line with a prior decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 122 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59979</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the reopening of assessment under section 147(a) of the IT Act for alleged non-disclosure of income from race horses. The Tribunal found the ITO&#039;s grounds for reassessment lacking and determined that the income from horse breeding was exempt under relevant provisions. It directed a reevaluation of the case, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the treatment of income from horse sales and the interpretation of &quot;livestock&quot; under section 10(27). The appeal was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside for reconsideration in line with a prior decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>