<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 214 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59942</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on tax deduction from payments to non-residents was deemed not maintainable due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully comply with tax payment requirements. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was canceled, and the AO&#039;s order was restored. Regarding the taxability of payments to foreign contractors for setting up a charge chrome plant, the CIT(A) found the payments non-taxable under certain exceptions but did not delve into the merits due to the appeal&#039;s technical grounds. The issue was left open for reconsideration upon meeting tax payment requirements and filing a fresh appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 214 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59942</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on tax deduction from payments to non-residents was deemed not maintainable due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully comply with tax payment requirements. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was canceled, and the AO&#039;s order was restored. Regarding the taxability of payments to foreign contractors for setting up a charge chrome plant, the CIT(A) found the payments non-taxable under certain exceptions but did not delve into the merits due to the appeal&#039;s technical grounds. The issue was left open for reconsideration upon meeting tax payment requirements and filing a fresh appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>