<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 161 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59930</link>
    <description>The majority decision, supported by the Third Member, upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order vacating the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 was not reinstated, as the delay in obtaining the final audit report was considered to have a reasonable cause under Section 273B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 161 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59930</link>
      <description>The majority decision, supported by the Third Member, upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order vacating the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 was not reinstated, as the delay in obtaining the final audit report was considered to have a reasonable cause under Section 273B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>