<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 102 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59848</link>
    <description>Lump-sum salami received from prospective tenants before the tenancy came into existence, and before completion of the building, was held to be a capital receipt rather than trading or revenue income. The receipts were treated as consideration for being let into possession of premises and were not shown to arise from a trading adventure comparable to leasing operations. The addition was therefore deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s contention failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 102 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59848</link>
      <description>Lump-sum salami received from prospective tenants before the tenancy came into existence, and before completion of the building, was held to be a capital receipt rather than trading or revenue income. The receipts were treated as consideration for being let into possession of premises and were not shown to arise from a trading adventure comparable to leasing operations. The addition was therefore deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s contention failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>