<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 91 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59840</link>
    <description>The power to rectify a mistake apparent from the record remains confined to the authority that passed the original order, and a later appellate authority cannot exercise that power in relation to an earlier AAC order. Applying that principle under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to amend the AAC&#039;s order. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable, and the departmental circular relied on was consistent with that view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 91 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59840</link>
      <description>The power to rectify a mistake apparent from the record remains confined to the authority that passed the original order, and a later appellate authority cannot exercise that power in relation to an earlier AAC order. Applying that principle under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to amend the AAC&#039;s order. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable, and the departmental circular relied on was consistent with that view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>