<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 50 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59833</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a departmental appeal was not condoned because the explanation of non-availability of assessment records was vague and unsupported by particulars. The Tribunal held that the applicant had not shown where the records were kept, when the search started, or when they were found, and therefore had not explained the delay with the specificity required. The cause shown was insufficient, and the appeal remained barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 50 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59833</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a departmental appeal was not condoned because the explanation of non-availability of assessment records was vague and unsupported by particulars. The Tribunal held that the applicant had not shown where the records were kept, when the search started, or when they were found, and therefore had not explained the delay with the specificity required. The cause shown was insufficient, and the appeal remained barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>