<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 295 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal largely upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, recognizing most expenses as necessary for business operations and consistent with past practices. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify and recalculate specific disallowances under legal provisions. The judgment underscored the significance of evidence and consistency in accounting, favoring the assessee in many instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 295 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal largely upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, recognizing most expenses as necessary for business operations and consistent with past practices. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify and recalculate specific disallowances under legal provisions. The judgment underscored the significance of evidence and consistency in accounting, favoring the assessee in many instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>