<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 101 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59816</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Revenue authorities&#039; decision on the interpretation of Section 23(2) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the 10% ceiling under the proviso does not extend to all dwelling houses. The ITAT also affirmed the fair rental income assessment for a property in Bombay, finding the estimate reasonable and dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 101 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59816</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Revenue authorities&#039; decision on the interpretation of Section 23(2) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the 10% ceiling under the proviso does not extend to all dwelling houses. The ITAT also affirmed the fair rental income assessment for a property in Bombay, finding the estimate reasonable and dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>