<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59808</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under section 201 of the Income Tax Act was not applicable due to their bonafide belief that perquisites should not be included in the salary for tax deduction under section 192. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of bonafide belief in interpreting tax laws and exempted the assessee from the penalty, directing the refund of any penalty amount paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59808</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under section 201 of the Income Tax Act was not applicable due to their bonafide belief that perquisites should not be included in the salary for tax deduction under section 192. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of bonafide belief in interpreting tax laws and exempted the assessee from the penalty, directing the refund of any penalty amount paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>