<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 114 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding their substantive right of appeal and directing a fresh hearing on the merits. The judgment emphasized the preservation of vested rights and clarified that the amendment to s. 249(4) of the IT Act, inserted in 1975, did not apply retrospectively in this case. This decision ensured a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case before the AAC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 114 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding their substantive right of appeal and directing a fresh hearing on the merits. The judgment emphasized the preservation of vested rights and clarified that the amendment to s. 249(4) of the IT Act, inserted in 1975, did not apply retrospectively in this case. This decision ensured a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case before the AAC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>