<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 95 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59776</link>
    <description>Valuation of an assessee&#039;s share in house property could not be sustained on the basis of a valuation report prepared in proceedings relating to other co-owners, because the assessee was not given an opportunity to cross-examine the Valuation Officer or to adduce contrary evidence. The tribunal treated that procedural safeguard as essential to a proper determination of the valuation issue. The valuation orders were therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after allowing cross-examination of the Departmental Valuation Officer and evidence in support of the assessee&#039;s valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:38:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 95 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59776</link>
      <description>Valuation of an assessee&#039;s share in house property could not be sustained on the basis of a valuation report prepared in proceedings relating to other co-owners, because the assessee was not given an opportunity to cross-examine the Valuation Officer or to adduce contrary evidence. The tribunal treated that procedural safeguard as essential to a proper determination of the valuation issue. The valuation orders were therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after allowing cross-examination of the Departmental Valuation Officer and evidence in support of the assessee&#039;s valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>