<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 261 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59770</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed loss on stock valuation for tax purposes due to the absence of trading activities. It emphasized the necessity of trading transactions to determine profits accurately and cautioned against allowing notional losses without actual transactions. The tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 36,200 for stock valuation was justified, highlighting the importance of adhering to accounting principles and business realities in determining profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 261 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59770</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed loss on stock valuation for tax purposes due to the absence of trading activities. It emphasized the necessity of trading transactions to determine profits accurately and cautioned against allowing notional losses without actual transactions. The tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 36,200 for stock valuation was justified, highlighting the importance of adhering to accounting principles and business realities in determining profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>