<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 218 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the reopening of assessments was invalid as it was based on a report obtained after the original assessments were completed, the reference to the Valuation Cell lacked jurisdiction, the assessee had maintained proper books of account, and the enhancement of the cost of construction by the CIT(A) was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 218 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the reopening of assessments was invalid as it was based on a report obtained after the original assessments were completed, the reference to the Valuation Cell lacked jurisdiction, the assessee had maintained proper books of account, and the enhancement of the cost of construction by the CIT(A) was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>