<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 266 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, applying section 26 of the Income-tax Act, which deals with income from house property owned by co-owners with definite and ascertainable shares. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the special provision of section 26 prevails over the general provision of section 167B, resulting in a lesser tax burden for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 266 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, applying section 26 of the Income-tax Act, which deals with income from house property owned by co-owners with definite and ascertainable shares. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the special provision of section 26 prevails over the general provision of section 167B, resulting in a lesser tax burden for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>