<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59757</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of Rs. 2 lakhs spent on a sculpture in Calcutta as expenditure on advertisement, publicity, and propaganda for the company&#039;s product &quot;Boroline.&quot; The judgment highlighted the statue&#039;s advertisement value, strategic location for public visibility, and the broad interpretation of business purpose under section 37(1) to encompass activities like advertisement to attract more business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59757</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of Rs. 2 lakhs spent on a sculpture in Calcutta as expenditure on advertisement, publicity, and propaganda for the company&#039;s product &quot;Boroline.&quot; The judgment highlighted the statue&#039;s advertisement value, strategic location for public visibility, and the broad interpretation of business purpose under section 37(1) to encompass activities like advertisement to attract more business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>