<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 389 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59721</link>
    <description>The treaty phrase &quot;operation of ships&quot; was construed by reference to contemporaneous international understanding and OECD commentary because it was not defined in the treaty or then-applicable domestic law. On that basis, freight income from slot chartering and feeder-vessel arrangements, being directly connected with international shipping operations, fell within Article 9(1) of the Indo-UK Treaty and was taxable only in the State of residence. Article 9(4) was also read broadly: income from the use of containers employed as an integral part of transport of goods was covered, even though &quot;use&quot; was not confined to rental or lease. The treaty benefit therefore extended to the disputed shipping and container receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 389 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59721</link>
      <description>The treaty phrase &quot;operation of ships&quot; was construed by reference to contemporaneous international understanding and OECD commentary because it was not defined in the treaty or then-applicable domestic law. On that basis, freight income from slot chartering and feeder-vessel arrangements, being directly connected with international shipping operations, fell within Article 9(1) of the Indo-UK Treaty and was taxable only in the State of residence. Article 9(4) was also read broadly: income from the use of containers employed as an integral part of transport of goods was covered, even though &quot;use&quot; was not confined to rental or lease. The treaty benefit therefore extended to the disputed shipping and container receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>