<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 444 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59718</link>
    <description>Inland haulage charges earned by a non-resident shipping enterprise for moving cargo from an inland point to the port, as part of a combined through-transport arrangement, were treated as income from the operation of ships in international traffic under Article 8 of the Indo-Belgium DTAA. Article 8(2)(b)(ii) was construed broadly to cover activities directly connected with transportation, and the presence of through bills of lading and a single composite movement supported that reading. Article 8(2)(c) on containers and related equipment was also read consistently with that approach. The receipts were therefore not regarded as a separate inland business and were not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 444 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59718</link>
      <description>Inland haulage charges earned by a non-resident shipping enterprise for moving cargo from an inland point to the port, as part of a combined through-transport arrangement, were treated as income from the operation of ships in international traffic under Article 8 of the Indo-Belgium DTAA. Article 8(2)(b)(ii) was construed broadly to cover activities directly connected with transportation, and the presence of through bills of lading and a single composite movement supported that reading. Article 8(2)(c) on containers and related equipment was also read consistently with that approach. The receipts were therefore not regarded as a separate inland business and were not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>