<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 301 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and permitting the carry forward of the loss. The four returns filed by the assessee&#039;s sub-divisions were deemed valid under section 292B, and the return filed on October 29, 2002, was not considered a revised return under section 139(5). Despite a dissenting opinion from the Vice-President, the majority opinion prevailed, enabling the assessee to carry forward the loss as per section 139(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 301 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and permitting the carry forward of the loss. The four returns filed by the assessee&#039;s sub-divisions were deemed valid under section 292B, and the return filed on October 29, 2002, was not considered a revised return under section 139(5). Despite a dissenting opinion from the Vice-President, the majority opinion prevailed, enabling the assessee to carry forward the loss as per section 139(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>