<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 228 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee is entitled to the benefits of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The Tribunal clarified that the term &#039;tax&#039; under Article 3(d) does not include amounts payable due to procedural defaults related to transfer pricing regulations. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s capital gain computed by the AO would be exempt from tax in India under the DTAA provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 228 - ITAT BOMBAY-L</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee is entitled to the benefits of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The Tribunal clarified that the term &#039;tax&#039; under Article 3(d) does not include amounts payable due to procedural defaults related to transfer pricing regulations. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s capital gain computed by the AO would be exempt from tax in India under the DTAA provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>