<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 294 - ITAT BOMBAY-K</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-K dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to allow the indexed cost of acquisition at Rs. 37,98,219. The Tribunal found the reference to the District Valuation Officer under section 55A invalid, supporting the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance of expenses to Rs. 10,70,000, rejecting the assessee&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 294 - ITAT BOMBAY-K</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-K dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to allow the indexed cost of acquisition at Rs. 37,98,219. The Tribunal found the reference to the District Valuation Officer under section 55A invalid, supporting the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance of expenses to Rs. 10,70,000, rejecting the assessee&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>