<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 349 - ITAT BOMBAY-K</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s revised computation of eligible profits for the assessee claiming deduction u/s 80HHC, allowing deduction on profit from the sale of DEPB entitlement. It held that profit on the sale of DEPB entitlement constitutes income chargeable to tax, considering the entire sale proceeds as profit due to lack of specific expenditure proof. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal to consider entire sale proceeds for proportionate increase of export profits, finding it misconceived and unsubstantiated by the Departmental Representative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 349 - ITAT BOMBAY-K</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s revised computation of eligible profits for the assessee claiming deduction u/s 80HHC, allowing deduction on profit from the sale of DEPB entitlement. It held that profit on the sale of DEPB entitlement constitutes income chargeable to tax, considering the entire sale proceeds as profit due to lack of specific expenditure proof. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal to consider entire sale proceeds for proportionate increase of export profits, finding it misconceived and unsubstantiated by the Departmental Representative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>