<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 208 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that hire purchase and bill discounting are not considered part of granting loans and advances within the scope of s. 73, Expln. (ii). A calculation error in determining the percentage of funds employed in granting loans and advances was acknowledged and corrected. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate assessment of capital employed in this business. Insufficient evidence led to remittance of the matter to the Assessing Officer for determining the principal business activity of the assessee. The Tribunal partially allowed the application, rectified the calculation mistake, and stressed the importance of proper evaluation in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 208 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that hire purchase and bill discounting are not considered part of granting loans and advances within the scope of s. 73, Expln. (ii). A calculation error in determining the percentage of funds employed in granting loans and advances was acknowledged and corrected. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate assessment of capital employed in this business. Insufficient evidence led to remittance of the matter to the Assessing Officer for determining the principal business activity of the assessee. The Tribunal partially allowed the application, rectified the calculation mistake, and stressed the importance of proper evaluation in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>