<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 209 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59674</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the orders passed by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) under sections 144, 147, and 163, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of interest under section 234B. The tribunal emphasized procedural fairness and prohibited double taxation, ensuring the same income is not taxed twice in different hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 209 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59674</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the orders passed by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) under sections 144, 147, and 163, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of interest under section 234B. The tribunal emphasized procedural fairness and prohibited double taxation, ensuring the same income is not taxed twice in different hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>