<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 449 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the reassessment. It concluded that the reopening of the assessment was not justified as it was based on the same facts without any new material, and there was no valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 449 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the reassessment. It concluded that the reopening of the assessment was not justified as it was based on the same facts without any new material, and there was no valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>