<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 447 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the AO&#039;s assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 was quashed. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, reinforcing the necessity for sustainable legal interpretations, particularly concerning the treatment of DEPB entitlements under s. 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 447 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the AO&#039;s assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 was quashed. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, reinforcing the necessity for sustainable legal interpretations, particularly concerning the treatment of DEPB entitlements under s. 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>