<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 248 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59649</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, determining that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80HHC for exports made through a third party. It emphasized the beneficial nature of the provision and the need for a liberal interpretation to promote foreign exchange earnings. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not violated any laws and distinguished the case from a precedent involving multiple claimants for the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:09:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 248 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59649</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, determining that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80HHC for exports made through a third party. It emphasized the beneficial nature of the provision and the need for a liberal interpretation to promote foreign exchange earnings. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not violated any laws and distinguished the case from a precedent involving multiple claimants for the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>