<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the decision of the CIT(A) and held that the additional compensation received during the pendency of litigation should not be taxed as &#039;Long Term Capital Gain&#039; until the dispute is finally resolved. The Tribunal emphasized that the enhanced compensation should only be taxed when it is ultimately received, not when it is still under dispute, to prevent undue hardship to the taxpayer and avoid multiple litigations. The decision was based on the interpretation and application of section 45(5) of the IT Act and relevant case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:00:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT BOMBAY-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the decision of the CIT(A) and held that the additional compensation received during the pendency of litigation should not be taxed as &#039;Long Term Capital Gain&#039; until the dispute is finally resolved. The Tribunal emphasized that the enhanced compensation should only be taxed when it is ultimately received, not when it is still under dispute, to prevent undue hardship to the taxpayer and avoid multiple litigations. The decision was based on the interpretation and application of section 45(5) of the IT Act and relevant case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>