<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 265 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the appeals to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication, directing the assessees to provide documentary evidence to verify the nature of services. If consistent with previous years, the AO was instructed to apply established legal propositions and grant relief. The appeals by the Revenue were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 265 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the appeals to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication, directing the assessees to provide documentary evidence to verify the nature of services. If consistent with previous years, the AO was instructed to apply established legal propositions and grant relief. The appeals by the Revenue were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>