<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 295 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59636</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 7 lakhs under section 68 of the Act was dismissed. The CIT(A) found the gift received by the assessee to be genuine based on supporting documents and evidence, including the relationship between the parties and the donor&#039;s creditworthiness. The delay in executing the gift deed was deemed irrelevant to the gift&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting that the statement recorded from the assessee showed signs of mental coercion, which did not invalidate the genuineness of the gift. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 295 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59636</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 7 lakhs under section 68 of the Act was dismissed. The CIT(A) found the gift received by the assessee to be genuine based on supporting documents and evidence, including the relationship between the parties and the donor&#039;s creditworthiness. The delay in executing the gift deed was deemed irrelevant to the gift&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting that the statement recorded from the assessee showed signs of mental coercion, which did not invalidate the genuineness of the gift. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>