<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 238 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the department&#039;s appeals. It upheld several disallowances against the assessee, including those under Rule 6D, Section 37(2A), and Section 37(4), citing precedents from higher courts. The Tribunal directed modifications regarding earlier year&#039;s expenditure and remanded the issue of interest under Section 234B for further consideration. It allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on sale and leaseback transactions, determining such transactions as genuine. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of club expenses and reversed some decisions, aligning with previous rulings and Supreme Court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 238 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the department&#039;s appeals. It upheld several disallowances against the assessee, including those under Rule 6D, Section 37(2A), and Section 37(4), citing precedents from higher courts. The Tribunal directed modifications regarding earlier year&#039;s expenditure and remanded the issue of interest under Section 234B for further consideration. It allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on sale and leaseback transactions, determining such transactions as genuine. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of club expenses and reversed some decisions, aligning with previous rulings and Supreme Court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>