<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal adjudicated multiple issues concerning the assessee&#039;s tax liabilities. It denied the deduction under section 80HHC, upheld the computation under section 80HHD, and allowed depreciation for specific years. The Tribunal allowed claims for leave salary encashment and club subscriptions but upheld disallowances for entertainment expenses, foreign travel, and penalties. It deleted disallowances for unclaimed balances, ad hoc entertainment, and certain maintenance expenses. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The assessee&#039;s and Department&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with cross-objections dismissed as infructuous. The decision applied pertinent legal principles and precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal adjudicated multiple issues concerning the assessee&#039;s tax liabilities. It denied the deduction under section 80HHC, upheld the computation under section 80HHD, and allowed depreciation for specific years. The Tribunal allowed claims for leave salary encashment and club subscriptions but upheld disallowances for entertainment expenses, foreign travel, and penalties. It deleted disallowances for unclaimed balances, ad hoc entertainment, and certain maintenance expenses. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The assessee&#039;s and Department&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with cross-objections dismissed as infructuous. The decision applied pertinent legal principles and precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>