<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 310 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the computation of income for the assessment year 2001-02. It found the transactions involving mutual funds to be genuine and not aimed at tax evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the legality of the transactions and distinguished them from dubious tax evasion methods. Relying on legal precedents and legislative amendments, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to accept the returned income, deleting the addition made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 310 - ITAT BOMBAY-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the computation of income for the assessment year 2001-02. It found the transactions involving mutual funds to be genuine and not aimed at tax evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the legality of the transactions and distinguished them from dubious tax evasion methods. Relying on legal precedents and legislative amendments, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to accept the returned income, deleting the addition made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>