<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 336 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1992-93 as the assessee voluntarily declared additional income following a search action, meeting the conditions of Explanation 5. The Tribunal found no concealment or inaccurate particulars of income, as the assessee proactively disclosed the additional income and sought to pay the tax through auctioning seized items. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee against the penalty levied was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 336 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1992-93 as the assessee voluntarily declared additional income following a search action, meeting the conditions of Explanation 5. The Tribunal found no concealment or inaccurate particulars of income, as the assessee proactively disclosed the additional income and sought to pay the tax through auctioning seized items. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee against the penalty levied was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>