<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 316 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessment was barred by limitation, deeming the notice issued under section 148 as invalid. The additions related to unaccounted production and forward sales were not addressed on merit due to the limitation issue. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, confirming that the assessment was time-barred and did not delve into the validity of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 316 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessment was barred by limitation, deeming the notice issued under section 148 as invalid. The additions related to unaccounted production and forward sales were not addressed on merit due to the limitation issue. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, confirming that the assessment was time-barred and did not delve into the validity of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>