https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59560 The Tribunal determined the residential status of the assessee, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The assessee was classified as "resident but not ordinarily resident" (RNOR) based on meeting the criteria under section 6(6)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee's claim for RNOR status and exemption under section 10(15)(iv)(fa) was upheld, overturning the Assessing Officer's assessment as "resident and ordinarily resident" (ROR). The decision also annulled the interest charge under section 234B, in line with the assessee's position. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59560 The Tribunal determined the residential status of the assessee, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The assessee was classified as "resident but not ordinarily resident" (RNOR) based on meeting the criteria under section 6(6)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee's claim for RNOR status and exemption under section 10(15)(iv)(fa) was upheld, overturning the Assessing Officer's assessment as "resident and ordinarily resident" (ROR). The decision also annulled the interest charge under section 234B, in line with the assessee's position. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59560