<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 248 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty order under Section 221, as the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for &#039;interest accrued but not due&#039; due to the inability to identify the payee. The Tribunal held that penalties for non-deduction of tax at source are governed by Section 271C, not Section 221.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 248 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty order under Section 221, as the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for &#039;interest accrued but not due&#039; due to the inability to identify the payee. The Tribunal held that penalties for non-deduction of tax at source are governed by Section 271C, not Section 221.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>