<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 232 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction and directed reassessment of capital gains, clarifying the classification of gains and correct tax rates. The appeals were partly allowed, with specific directions for reassessment and application of the correct tax rate on long-term capital gains as per section 113, taxing gains at 60%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 232 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction and directed reassessment of capital gains, clarifying the classification of gains and correct tax rates. The appeals were partly allowed, with specific directions for reassessment and application of the correct tax rate on long-term capital gains as per section 113, taxing gains at 60%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>