<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 315 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest payment under section 36(1)(iii) as the transaction lacked evidence supporting its business nature. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of administrative expenses as the issue was not pressed during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 315 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest payment under section 36(1)(iii) as the transaction lacked evidence supporting its business nature. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of administrative expenses as the issue was not pressed during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>