<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 159 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals of the assessee, overturning the penalties imposed for concealment of income. The Tribunal determined that the appeal filing fees were sufficient, the penalty imposed was not directly linked to the assessed income but based on tax evasion, and no penalty for concealment should have been imposed due to legitimate reasons for declaring &#039;Nil&#039; income under the project completion method for the construction business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 159 - ITAT BOMBAY-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals of the assessee, overturning the penalties imposed for concealment of income. The Tribunal determined that the appeal filing fees were sufficient, the penalty imposed was not directly linked to the assessed income but based on tax evasion, and no penalty for concealment should have been imposed due to legitimate reasons for declaring &#039;Nil&#039; income under the project completion method for the construction business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>