<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 334 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the Section 80HHE deduction and deleting the disallowance of the overseas maintenance allowance. The Tribunal found the agreements valid, confirmed the technical qualifications and employment status of the personnel, and ruled that the payments were not subject to TDS. The cross-objection regarding bad debts was dismissed as infructuous. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 334 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the Section 80HHE deduction and deleting the disallowance of the overseas maintenance allowance. The Tribunal found the agreements valid, confirmed the technical qualifications and employment status of the personnel, and ruled that the payments were not subject to TDS. The cross-objection regarding bad debts was dismissed as infructuous. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>