<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 116 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the applicability of Rule 115 and the calculation of depreciation based on the current exchange rate. It also agreed with the CIT(A) that the second proviso to Section 32(1) did not apply. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on guest house expenses, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance of guest house expenses being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:08:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 116 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the applicability of Rule 115 and the calculation of depreciation based on the current exchange rate. It also agreed with the CIT(A) that the second proviso to Section 32(1) did not apply. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on guest house expenses, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance of guest house expenses being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>