<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 201 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order that only income derived from export business qualifies for deduction under Section 80HHC. Sales treated as local sales were not considered export turnover. The treatment of export incentives and margin money as local sales was affirmed. The inclusion of certain incomes in business income for deduction purposes was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in part, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 201 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order that only income derived from export business qualifies for deduction under Section 80HHC. Sales treated as local sales were not considered export turnover. The treatment of export incentives and margin money as local sales was affirmed. The inclusion of certain incomes in business income for deduction purposes was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in part, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>