<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 235 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the agricultural income of the minor children of the assessee cannot be clubbed with the agricultural income of the assessee under section 64(1A) for rate purposes. The Tribunal emphasized that agricultural income does not form part of total income and clarified that section 64(1A) specifically pertains to clubbing the total income of minor children with the parent&#039;s income, excluding agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 235 - ITAT BOMBAY-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the agricultural income of the minor children of the assessee cannot be clubbed with the agricultural income of the assessee under section 64(1A) for rate purposes. The Tribunal emphasized that agricultural income does not form part of total income and clarified that section 64(1A) specifically pertains to clubbing the total income of minor children with the parent&#039;s income, excluding agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>