<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 232 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to adjust the interest income from advances to contractors in the work-in-progress as business income. The interest income from advances to NMPT was also treated as business income, not income from other sources, with directions for the AO to rework the income accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 232 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to adjust the interest income from advances to contractors in the work-in-progress as business income. The interest income from advances to NMPT was also treated as business income, not income from other sources, with directions for the AO to rework the income accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>