<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 292 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59451</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bombay-F canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on a tour operator company for claiming a deduction under section 80HHD. The company withdrew the deduction claim before the assessment was finalized, disclosing all facts. The tribunal found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the penalty being overturned and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 292 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59451</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bombay-F canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on a tour operator company for claiming a deduction under section 80HHD. The company withdrew the deduction claim before the assessment was finalized, disclosing all facts. The tribunal found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the penalty being overturned and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>