<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It disallowed the deduction under Section 43B for belated provident fund contributions, following the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision in Pamwi Tissues Ltd., which took precedence over the Apex Court&#039;s earlier dismissal in Vinay Cements Ltd. However, the Tribunal upheld the deduction under Section 80-IA for the assessee engaged solely in developing infrastructural facilities. It determined that the amendments to Section 80-IA allowed deductions for enterprises involved in developing, maintaining, or operating such facilities, thus dismissing the revenue&#039;s challenge on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It disallowed the deduction under Section 43B for belated provident fund contributions, following the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision in Pamwi Tissues Ltd., which took precedence over the Apex Court&#039;s earlier dismissal in Vinay Cements Ltd. However, the Tribunal upheld the deduction under Section 80-IA for the assessee engaged solely in developing infrastructural facilities. It determined that the amendments to Section 80-IA allowed deductions for enterprises involved in developing, maintaining, or operating such facilities, thus dismissing the revenue&#039;s challenge on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>