<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 330 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and treated the Department&#039;s appeal as allowed for statistical purposes. The key findings were that the sister concerns were not agents of the assessee, the export proceeds were not received in convertible foreign exchange by the assessee, and the disallowance of interest-free advances needed further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 330 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and treated the Department&#039;s appeal as allowed for statistical purposes. The key findings were that the sister concerns were not agents of the assessee, the export proceeds were not received in convertible foreign exchange by the assessee, and the disallowance of interest-free advances needed further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>