<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 168 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming no short-term capital gains arose from the revaluation and reconstitution of the partnership firm, as the revaluation was a mere book entry without any transfer of rights. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The assessees&#039; cross-objections regarding the reopening of assessments under section 147 were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 168 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming no short-term capital gains arose from the revaluation and reconstitution of the partnership firm, as the revaluation was a mere book entry without any transfer of rights. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The assessees&#039; cross-objections regarding the reopening of assessments under section 147 were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>