<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 206 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 272A(2)(c) was not applicable for delays in filing quarterly returns under rule 37A as they are not prescribed under section 206. Financial constraints were deemed a reasonable cause for the delay, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 206 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 272A(2)(c) was not applicable for delays in filing quarterly returns under rule 37A as they are not prescribed under section 206. Financial constraints were deemed a reasonable cause for the delay, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>